For discussion purposes only
Discipline Task Force Minutes
Friday, September 12, 1997
12:00- 2:30 p.m.
Weber School District Office
Attendance:
Margaret Lubke, Davale Saley Miller, Ken Reavis, Holly Dixon, Deb Cheney, Tom VanGorder, Ann Miller, Deb Andrews, Nan Gray, Mae Taylor-Sweeten
Action Steps:
Scheduled Meetings:
Next Scheduled Meeting Tuesday, September 23, 1997
10:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m.
Park City School District Office
Tom Van Gorder
645-5600 ext 132
Future meeting scheduled: Friday October 3, 1997
10:00 a.m. - 1:00 p.m.
West Valley City Jr. High
3400 South 3450 West
Salt Lake City
Sharon Neyme, Principal
(801) 964-7630
Reference Materials used during this meeting:
Discussion
1. The Task Force reviewed the focus of the committee as described in the meeting agenda.
2. The Task Force reviewed the minutes from the last meeting and recommended that several clarifications be added.
1. For changes in placement for more than 10 days:
"School personnel" refers to a district superintendent or designee, or a special education director/coordinator
Thus, only a district superintendent or designee or special education director/coordinator can unilaterally change the placement of a student but only for not more than 10 days.
2. For suspending a student for not more than 10 days
"School personnel" refers to a school principal, a district superintendent or designee, or a special education director/coordinator
Thus, in reference to suspensions, the definition of "school personnel" is expanded to include school principals and they can suspend a student for not more than 10 days.
Sec. 615 (k) of PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS section:
(k) Placement in Alternative Educational Setting.-
(1) Authority of school personnel.-
5. There was much discussion regarding the question- "Does an IEP team have to meet after a student is suspended for one day?" (See below). Everyone was most concerned regarding the implications of a such a requirement and recommended that the regulations/and or state rules read "the IEP team would review the student's IEP and if conditions warrant, conduct an IEP meeting."
(B) Either before or not later than 10 days after taking a disciplinary action described in subparagraph (A)--
6. The Task Force interpreted the requirement "
7. The Task Force noted that a school wide discipline plan might be considered a behavior intervention plan.
8. The Task Force also noted that and IEP meeting could be held by alternate means of participation such as a conference call between parent(s) and school personnel and the meeting could be brief.
9. One Task Force member recommended including a functional behavior analysis as one of the classification requirements for students with behavior disorders. This recommendation will be passed on to the Evaluation and Eligibility Task Force.
10. In reference to the provision in Sec. 615. (k)(1)(A)(ii) "for the same amount of time that a child without a disability would be subject to discipline,", it was noted as a matter of further clarification, that the Jeffers Amendment and Gun-Free School legislation is built in to P.L. 105-17. Also, further clarified was the fact that students can be placed in an interim alternative setting for not more than 45 days without consent and longer with parental consent.
11. The task force again discussed the term "others" in Sec.615.(k)(2) (below)
(2) AUTHORITY OF HEARING OFFICER.--A hearing officer under this section may order a change in the placement of a child with a disability to an appropriate interim alternative educational setting for not more than 45 days if the hearing officer--
(A) determines that the public agency has demonstrated by substantial evidence that maintaining the current placement of such child is substantially likely to result in injury to the child or to others;
The group felt that "others" could be interpreted as meaning "property"?
The phrase "likely to result" was also discussed but no decisions were made regarding the interpretation of the phrase.
12. The Determination of Setting was discussed as it applies to an appropriate interim alternative educational setting for not more than 45 calendar days. The meanings of several terms were discussed.
(3) DETERMINATION OF SETTING
-
(A) IN GENERAL- The alternative educational setting described in paragraph (1)(A)(ii) shall be determined by the IEP Team.
(B) ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS- Any interim alternative educational setting in which a child is placed under paragraph (1) or (2) shall-
(i) be selected so as to enable the child to continue to participate in the general curriculum, although in another setting, and to continue to receive those services and modifications, including those described in the child's current IEP, that will enable the child to meet the goals set out in that IEP; and
(ii) include services and modifications designed to address the behavior described in paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) so that it does not recur.